【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
gre改革后新版gre写作新题库里的作文方面的一个重要变化是有了指导语。而指导语的作用是有助于我们的逻辑性写作，以下是新版gre写作新题库内有关argument81的写作部分：
题目：
The following appeared in a business magazine.
As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concluded that the canned tuna did not, after all, pose a health risk. This conclusion is based on tests performed on samples of the recalled cans by chemists from Promofoods; the chemists found that of the eight food chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find small amounts of the three remaining suspected chemicals but pointed out that these occur naturally in all canned foods.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.
中文翻译：
去年由于有大量消费者投诉说产生了眩晕和恶心，Promofoods要求800万罐金枪鱼回收检测。Promofoods下结论说这些罐头根本不含任何有健康危害的化学物质。这一结论基于这样的事实，即Promofoods的化学家测试了回收的罐头样本，并发现8种最常见的导致眩晕和恶心症状的化学物质中，有五种都没有在任何被测试的罐头中被发现。化学家确实发现剩下三种受怀疑的化学物质在所有其他罐头食品中都存在，并指出这在所有的关头中都存在，属于正常现象。
写一篇回应，在其中讨论还有哪些问题需要被回答才能决定文中的建议以及得出这一建议结论的论证过程是合理的，并务请解释对这些问题的回答是如何帮助更好的评估文中的建议结论的。
此上就是新版gre写作新题库 argument81的内容从今天起小编就给大家连续提供新版gre写作新题库argument部分的内容。希望大家能够在练习中提高自己的写作水平。
gre改革后新版gre写作新题库里的作文方面的一个重要变化是有了指导语。而指导语的作用是有助于我们的逻辑性写作，以下是新版gre写作新题库内有关argument81的写作部分：
题目：
The following appeared in a business magazine.
As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concluded that the canned tuna did not, after all, pose a health risk. This conclusion is based on tests performed on samples of the recalled cans by chemists from Promofoods; the chemists found that of the eight food chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find small amounts of the three remaining suspected chemicals but pointed out that these occur naturally in all canned foods.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.
中文翻译：
去年由于有大量消费者投诉说产生了眩晕和恶心，Promofoods要求800万罐金枪鱼回收检测。Promofoods下结论说这些罐头根本不含任何有健康危害的化学物质。这一结论基于这样的事实，即Promofoods的化学家测试了回收的罐头样本，并发现8种最常见的导致眩晕和恶心症状的化学物质中，有五种都没有在任何被测试的罐头中被发现。化学家确实发现剩下三种受怀疑的化学物质在所有其他罐头食品中都存在，并指出这在所有的关头中都存在，属于正常现象。
写一篇回应，在其中讨论还有哪些问题需要被回答才能决定文中的建议以及得出这一建议结论的论证过程是合理的，并务请解释对这些问题的回答是如何帮助更好的评估文中的建议结论的。
此上就是新版gre写作新题库 argument81的内容从今天起小编就给大家连续提供新版gre写作新题库argument部分的内容。希望大家能够在练习中提高自己的写作水平。
